HostXLM vs XVVS — price, size and safety, side by side
XLM (Cronos) vs XVVS (Cronos) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
XLM vs XVVS — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| XLM | XVVS | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.1804 | $0.000001373 |
| Market cap | — | — |
| 24h volume | $4.12K DEX | $4.35K DEX |
| Liquidity | $62.40K | $2.84K |
| FDV | $1.38M | $5.55M |
| Holders | 4,134 | 12,603 |
| Age (days) | 1,677 | 1,418 |
| Safety grade | E | C |
Where they differ
- XLM measures ~22× the liquidity of XVVS
- XVVS measures ~3.0× the holder count of XLM
What the data says
XLM
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on XLM. As of 2026-10-09, XLM's contract still holds a mint and freeze levers, leaving the deployer able to create new supply or freeze transfers for now. Read the rest of the page with that in mind — it's why XLM is at E (21/100) as of 2026-10-09, with real room to improve.
Market-wise, XLM carries workable liquidity of $62.40K, 4,134 holders and an established record at 1,677 days as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $62.40K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. A 4,134-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created XLM holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
XVVS
There's one detail worth understanding before anything else on XVVS. The mint function on XVVS's contract is still live as of 2026-10-09, which keeps the option open for them to create new supply. That's what's holding the score at 60/100 for now; it's a good thing to keep an eye on, and the grade would rise if it's removed.
Looking at the market data, XVVS shows $2.84K of on-chain liquidity, 12,603 wallets holding and an established 1,418-day history as of 2026-10-09. Read $2.84K of depth against the size you intend to trade rather than in isolation — it's the pool your exit has to pass through, so it doubles as a sensible position ceiling. The 12,603-wallet base is a reasonable spread of ownership, though a headline count doesn't show whether a few wallets dominate — the concentration read on this page speaks to that. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of XVVS as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, XLM or XVVS?
By tracked market cap: XLM (Cronos) measures — and XVVS (Cronos) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, XLM or XVVS?
On the contract checks we publish: XLM (Cronos) grades E and XVVS (Cronos) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have XLM and XVVS performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show XLM at −6.28% and XVVS at −7.13%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.