HostYEET vs BYUSD — price, size and safety, side by side
YEET (Berachain) vs BYUSD (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
YEET vs BYUSD — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| YEET | BYUSD | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003095 | $0.9975 |
| Market cap | $27.65K | $131.49K |
| 24h volume | $35.56 DEX | $608.86 DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.54K | $2.68K |
| FDV | $33.13K | $131.49K |
| Holders | 20,240 | 5,123 |
| Age (days) | 606 | 595 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- BYUSD measures ~4.8× the market cap of YEET
- YEET measures ~1.7× the liquidity of BYUSD
- BYUSD measures ~17× the 24h volume of YEET
- YEET measures ~4.0× the holder count of BYUSD
- over the shared window YEET moved −21.5% while BYUSD moved −0.07%
What the data says
YEET
YEET's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why YEET earns a A (85/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On the market side, YEET brings $4.54K of on-chain liquidity, 20,240 wallets holding and 606 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.54K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $27.65K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 20,240-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created YEET holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
BYUSD
The contract behind BYUSD is about as reassuring as they come. Minting simply isn't in the contract, so dilution isn't on the table, and it can't freeze or block transfers, keeping your ability to sell fully open. That's why BYUSD sits comfortably at 85/100 as of 2026-10-09 — the pitfalls that sink most tokens simply aren't here.
Looking at the market data, BYUSD shows $2.68K of on-chain liquidity, 5,123 wallets holding and an established record at 595 days as of 2026-10-09. Against a market cap of about $131.49K, the $2.68K pool is workable rather than deep — fine for ordinary size to move in and out, though a larger position would start to feel the pool's edges. A 5,123-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, YEET or BYUSD?
By tracked market cap: YEET (Berachain) measures $27.65K and BYUSD (Berachain) measures $131.49K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, YEET or BYUSD?
On the contract checks we publish: YEET (Berachain) grades A and BYUSD (Berachain) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have YEET and BYUSD performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show YEET at −21.5% and BYUSD at −0.07%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.