HostYEET vs EWBERA-4 — price, size and safety, side by side
YEET (Berachain) vs EWBERA-4 (Berachain) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
YEET vs EWBERA-4 — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| YEET | EWBERA-4 | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.00003095 | $0.3062 |
| Market cap | $27.65K | — |
| 24h volume | $35.56 DEX | $5.57K DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.54K | $1.42K |
| FDV | $33.13K | $445.89K |
| Holders | 20,240 | 7,799 |
| Age (days) | 606 | 508 |
| Safety grade | A | B |
Where they differ
- YEET measures ~3.2× the liquidity of EWBERA-4
- EWBERA-4 measures ~157× the 24h volume of YEET
- YEET measures ~2.6× the holder count of EWBERA-4
- over the shared window YEET moved −21.5% while EWBERA-4 moved −11.8%
What the data says
YEET
YEET's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract holds no mint power, so the supply stays honest and predictable, and with no transfer pause in the contract either, your exit stays open whenever you choose to take it. That's exactly the setup you want to see, and it's why YEET earns a A (85/100) on the contract read as of 2026-10-09 — from here, it's really just the market to weigh.
On the market side, YEET brings $4.54K of on-chain liquidity, 20,240 wallets holding and 606 days old as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.54K pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $27.65K — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 20,240-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. Reassuringly, the wallet that created YEET holds under 5% of supply (<0.01%) as of 2026-10-09 — the deployer hasn't kept an oversized stake to unload.
EWBERA-4
There's a small gap on this page — EWBERA-4's contract flags weren't fully confirmed as of 2026-10-09. So rather than assume anything either way, it's worth a direct check, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
Market-wise, EWBERA-4 carries a $1.42K pool, 7,799 wallets holding and 508 days old as of 2026-10-09. Depth like $1.42K matters most relative to your own trade size; it's what decides whether you exit at the price you see or slip on the way out. A 7,799-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
FAQ
Which is bigger, YEET or EWBERA-4?
By tracked market cap: YEET (Berachain) measures $27.65K and EWBERA-4 (Berachain) measures — — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, YEET or EWBERA-4?
On the contract checks we publish: YEET (Berachain) grades A and EWBERA-4 (Berachain) grades B. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have YEET and EWBERA-4 performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show YEET at −21.5% and EWBERA-4 at −11.8%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.