HostYES vs OHNO — price, size and safety, side by side
YES (Blast) vs OHNO (Blast) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-17.
YES vs OHNO — normalized performance, 2026-10-09 to 2026-10-17T03:15:24
| YES | OHNO | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $3.17 | $0.00007459 |
| Market cap | $46.93M | $778.43K |
| 24h volume | $298.46 DEX | $65.45 DEX |
| Liquidity | $4.72M | $164.73K |
| FDV | $155.72M | $778.43K |
| Holders | 7,406 | 22,296 |
| Age (days) | 950 | 925 |
| Safety grade | B | A |
Where they differ
- YES measures ~60× the market cap of OHNO
- YES measures ~29× the liquidity of OHNO
- YES measures ~4.6× the 24h volume of OHNO
- OHNO measures ~3.0× the holder count of YES
What the data says
YES
One detail on YES didn't fully resolve in the 2026-10-09 snapshot: its contract controls. So it's best treated as unconfirmed rather than assumed clean, and the scanner above reads it live in a couple of seconds before you trade.
On liquidity and holders, YES shows deep liquidity of $4.72M, a holder base of 7,406 and an established record at 950 days as of 2026-10-09. Encouragingly, that $4.72M pool is deep relative to a market cap of about $46.93M — the kind of ratio that lets real size move in and out without much slippage. A 7,406-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. The creator's own position is small — <0.01% of supply as of 2026-10-09, comfortably under the 5% line the scanners flag — which is what you want to see.
OHNO
OHNO's contract lacks the two powers a bad actor would want to keep. The contract can't create new tokens — the supply is capped for good, and no pause or blacklist lever exists, so nothing can lock up your balance when you want out. Clearing both of those in one go is a strong sign, and it's what puts OHNO at 92/100 as of the 2026-10-09 snapshot.
Market-wise, OHNO carries deep liquidity of $164.73K, 22,296 wallets holding and an established record at 925 days as of 2026-10-09. Against roughly $778.43K in market cap, the $164.73K of liquidity is genuinely healthy: deep enough that ordinary trades clear cleanly, which is exactly what you want to see. A 22,296-holder base is a fair start, but distribution matters more than the count — check how much sits in the largest wallets before leaning on it. On concentration, the deployer wallet holds just <0.01% of OHNO as of 2026-10-09, so the person who launched it isn't sitting on a dominant share.
FAQ
Which is bigger, YES or OHNO?
By tracked market cap: YES (Blast) measures $46.93M and OHNO (Blast) measures $778.43K — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, YES or OHNO?
On the contract checks we publish: YES (Blast) grades B and OHNO (Blast) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have YES and OHNO performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-10-09 and 2026-10-17T03:15:24, the measured snapshots show YES at −2.16% and OHNO at −4.17%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-10-09→2026-10-17T03:15:24; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.