HostZAMA vs GRT — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAMA (BNB Chain) vs GRT (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
ZAMA vs GRT — normalized performance, 2026-09-27 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| ZAMA | GRT | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.07442 | $0.02465 |
| Market cap | $245.37M | $291.13M |
| 24h volume | $7.04M DEX | $27.27K DEX |
| Liquidity | $313.10K | $119.49K |
| FDV | $22.90M | $287.38M |
| Holders | 3,540 | 172,259 |
| Age (days) | 234 | 1,813 |
| Safety grade | A | C |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~2.6× the liquidity of GRT
- ZAMA measures ~258× the 24h volume of GRT
- GRT measures ~49× the holder count of ZAMA
- over the shared window ZAMA moved −8.92% while GRT moved −14.1%
What the data says
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
GRT
GRT — 0xc944e90c64b2c07662a292be6244bdf05cda44a7 — is The Graph's work token, the asset indexers stake and delegators bond to secure the indexing layer a large share of DeFi queries run through. Five years old, it is infrastructure by tenure as much as by function.
The October 9, 2026 snapshot reads a $291.1 million market cap — FDV sits at $309.9 million, so supply is essentially fully circulating — with 172,259 holders and $119.5 thousand of tracked depth on the venues this ledger prices. The day is strong: +14.1%.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAMA or GRT?
By tracked market cap: ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M and GRT (Ethereum) measures $291.13M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAMA or GRT?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A and GRT (Ethereum) grades C. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAMA and GRT performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-27 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show ZAMA at −8.92% and GRT at −14.1%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-27→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.