HostZAMA vs STOCKER — price, size and safety, side by side
ZAMA (BNB Chain) vs STOCKER (Ethereum) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-16.
ZAMA vs STOCKER — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-16T21:15:32
| ZAMA | STOCKER | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $0.07442 | $0.0014 |
| Market cap | $245.37M | $4.07M |
| 24h volume | $7.04M DEX | $1.01M DEX |
| Liquidity | $313.10K | $174.51K |
| FDV | $22.90M | $3.90M |
| Holders | 3,540 | 2,724 |
| Age (days) | 234 | 33 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZAMA measures ~60× the market cap of STOCKER
- ZAMA measures ~1.8× the liquidity of STOCKER
- ZAMA measures ~7.0× the 24h volume of STOCKER
- over the shared window ZAMA moved −23.6% while STOCKER moved −46.0%
What the data says
ZAMA
ZAMA at 0x6907a5986c4950bdaf2f81828ec0737ce787519f is a 234-day-old BNB Chain book priced at a $245.4 million asset-wide market cap against a $22.9 million fully-diluted figure priced on 230.5 million local units at the October 6, 2026 snapshot.
The local book is thin for the headline and the tape is the busiest in this set: $313.1 thousand of tracked depth on $7.0 million of 24-hour volume — routed flow cycling the pool more than twenty times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
STOCKER
STOCKER — "Stockereum.fun" on Ethereum, contract 0x75e2fc69ff2ac12af65ba7d321bbf4f878c535d2 — is a tokenized-stock parody platform token: the ".fun" domain pattern signals a launchpad-style site for fake "stocks on Ethereum" — a satire of the xStocks trend. The October 9, 2026 snapshot shows $175 thousand of liquidity and ~$1.1 million of daily volume — a 6.7x turnover, a hyperactive book.
At $0.0026 per unit the token is a standard meme-shape, but the volume-to-liquidity ratio says the pool churns constantly — either a genuinely active trading community or wash/inventory flow. No holder count or market cap on the row; on EVM the scan reads holders at render time.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZAMA or STOCKER?
By tracked market cap: ZAMA (BNB Chain) measures $245.37M and STOCKER (Ethereum) measures $4.07M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZAMA or STOCKER?
On the contract checks we publish: ZAMA (BNB Chain) grades A and STOCKER (Ethereum) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZAMA and STOCKER performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-16T21:15:32, the measured snapshots show ZAMA at −23.6% and STOCKER at −46.0%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-16T21:15:32; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.