HostZRO vs PLAY — price, size and safety, side by side
ZRO (Base) vs PLAY (Base) — every figure is the freshest dated measurement we hold for that token, never a live-feed guess. Prices stamped 2026-10-17 / 2026-10-15.
ZRO vs PLAY — normalized performance, 2026-09-21 to 2026-10-15T21:43:45
| ZRO | PLAY | |
|---|---|---|
| Price | $1.95 | $0.01763 |
| Market cap | $815.18M | $11.67M |
| 24h volume | $2.00M DEX | $1.06M DEX |
| Liquidity | $302.91K | $301.30K |
| FDV | $12.41M | $124.98M |
| Holders | 448,955 | 6,454 |
| Age (days) | 176 | 140 |
| Safety grade | A | A |
Where they differ
- ZRO measures ~70× the market cap of PLAY
- ZRO measures ~1.9× the 24h volume of PLAY
- ZRO measures ~70× the holder count of PLAY
- over the shared window ZRO moved +48.6% while PLAY moved −43.5%
What the data says
ZRO
ZRO at 0x6985884c4392d348587b19cb9eaaf157f13271cd — LayerZero — is the Base deployment, 158 days into its record at the October 9, 2026 snapshot and carrying a byte-identical address to the Optimism one — the same omnichain contract deployed deterministically on each chain. The asset-wide $815.2 million market cap towers over the $12.4 million fully-diluted figure on 6.1 million local units.
The local book is thin for the headline but the tape is the liveliest of the ZRO books: $302.9 thousand of tracked depth on $912.0 thousand of 24-hour volume — turnover three times the pool daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
PLAY
PLAY at 0x853a7c99227499dba9db8c3a02aa691afdebf841 is a Base asset 140 days into its record at the October 6, 2026 snapshot. The $11.7 million market cap prices under a tenth of the $125.0 million fully-diluted figure on 5.0 billion units — the emission overhang dominates this book's shape.
The book is workable and the tape is hot: $301.3 thousand of tracked depth on $1.1 million of 24-hour volume — the pool cycling itself several times daily. Contract-level controls were not assessed in this snapshot.
FAQ
Which is bigger, ZRO or PLAY?
By tracked market cap: ZRO (Base) measures $815.18M and PLAY (Base) measures $11.67M — dated snapshots, not a live feed.
Which is safer, ZRO or PLAY?
On the contract checks we publish: ZRO (Base) grades A and PLAY (Base) grades A. A grade is a structural check on the contract, not a promise about the asset.
How have ZRO and PLAY performed over the shared window?
Between 2026-09-21 and 2026-10-15T21:43:45, the measured snapshots show ZRO at +48.6% and PLAY at −43.5%.
The grade column is the one CMC's compare page cannot print — our grade is computed from the contract itself (mint/freeze authority, liquidity, holder concentration). Changes are measured over the shared window stated on the chart, 2026-09-21→2026-10-15T21:43:45; a token with fewer measured points measures a shorter span inside it.
Figures are dated on-chain snapshots, not a live feed. Safety grades are structural checks — not investment advice. Free · no signup · a HostDeFi product.